Tribunal fees scrapped in landmark court ruling
The fees, introduced by the coalition Government in 2013, meant that workers who had been treated unfairly or illegally were forced to pay up to £1,200 to take their employers to court.
Unison took the case to the Supreme Court, with lawyers arguing that the fees had been a huge expense for many low-paid employees and prevented people from gaining justice in the workplace – as evidenced by the 79% drop in cases being brought forward after the fees were introduced.
The UK’s highest court ruled in favour of the union, stating that the fees were “inconsistent with access to justice” and in conflicted with the Equality Act 2010 because they disproportionately affected women.
As a result of the victory, the Government is set to refund more than £27m to claimants in what Unison General Secretary Dave Prentis has described as “a major victory for employees everywhere”.
Commenting on the ruling, FDA General Secretary Dave Penman said: “I’d like to congratulate Unison for leading on this issue and ultimately winning this important victory for workers across the country.
“When the fees were introduced, the FDA took the decision to pay all tribunal costs on behalf of members, but not everybody has access to this kind of support.
“Unison’s hard work in pursuing this issue means many more people can now get access to the justice they deserve.”
Related News
-
Driving improvement
If the government wants efficiencies, it needs to address the big challenge of civil service pay reform, writes FDA General Secretary Dave Penman.
-
Unlock your leadership and management potential
As part of Young Workers’ Month, the FDA highlights how development schemes like the Fast Stream can set young workers up for a successful career in public service, and how the union will support them along the way.
-
Prime Minister responds to FDA’s criticism of his language regarding civil servants
FDA General Secretary Dave Penman received a letter from Prime Minister Keir Starmer responding to the FDA’s criticism of statements he made regarding the civil service during his Plan for Change speech.