New guidance is asking “civil servants to break the law”, says FDA
FDA General Secretary Dave Penman has strongly criticised new guidance issued to civil servants, as it puts them in an “invidious position” and calls into question the integrity of the civil service, which has an obligation to uphold the rule of law, whether that is domestic or international law.
The guidance states that decisions whether to comply with a Rule 39 injunction from the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) and the “implications of such a decision in respect of the UK’s international obligations are a matter for ministers”, not civil servants.
Penman argued there is a clear difference between not asking civil servants to breach international law, and telling them not to worry about breaching international law. He told the Guardian that “changing guidance… does not change the facts… If the ECHR rules a deportation unlawful, those are the facts of the case”.
“Ministers are trying to put civil servants in an invidious position by placing them between serving ministers and their professional obligations, he added. “It looks as if ministers are trying to avoid leaving the ECHR and are asking civil servants to break the law instead.”
Speaking to John Pienaar on Times Radio, the General Secretary said that he interprets the new guidance as ministers putting civil servants in the middle of “an internal dispute within the Conservative Party”.
Related News
-
FDA welcomes additional CPS funding to support victims of crime
The FDA has welcomed that the CPS will be receiving additional resources. The announcement follows the recent publication of the FDA’s report examining the CPS’s role in increasing RASSO prosecutions.
-
Budget response: FDA welcomes HMRC investment but raises concerns over ongoing departmental efficiencies
Budget response: FDA welcomes HMRC investment but raises concerns over ongoing departmental efficiencies
-
FDA tells MSPs uncertainty around jobs regarding future of new education body has been “very difficult”
The FDA has expressed concerns over job security, pay and a long hours culture to the Scottish Parliament, regarding the creation of a new education body in Scotland.